50/50 Custody in California: What Happens If One Parent Works and the Other Doesn’t?
50/50 custody in California focuses on a child’s best interest, not a parent’s job title.
When one parent has a demanding career and the other parent does not work, or works significantly less, a predictable set of questions comes up:
Will the court assume I’m too busy to parent?
Does California favor the stay-at-home parent?
Will my travel or long hours hurt my chances of getting 50/50 custody?
These concerns are common among executives, business owners, physicians, attorneys, and finance professionals in Los Angeles. The short answer is this:
Under California law, custody decisions are not based on who works more. Courts decide custody based on the child’s best interest, and that analysis is more practical and fact-driven than most people expect.
Below is how courts actually approach 50/50 custody when one parent works demanding hours and the other does not.
The Legal Standard: Best Interest of the Child
In California, custody decisions are governed by the “best interest of the child” standard under Family Code § 3020.
Judges evaluate factors such as:
The child’s health, safety, and welfare
The nature and amount of contact with each parent
Each parent’s ability to provide stability
Any history of abuse or substance issues
The child’s ties to school, community, and extracurricular activities
What is notably absent from this list is employment status. While a judge may consider any additional factors relevant to a particular family, California law does not automatically favor a stay-at-home parent. Nor does it penalize a parent for having a demanding profession. The focus remains on parenting capacity, stability, and meaningful involvement, not job title or income.
Does a Demanding Career Hurt Your Chances of 50/50 Custody?
In most cases, no.
What matters is not how many hours you work. What matters is how your schedule affects your children.
Judges tend to look at questions like:
How are school drop-offs, bedtime, and medical appointments going to be handled?
Can each parent reliably manage school and extracurricular activity schedules?
Is there flexibility in the work structure?
Is childcare responsibly arranged when needed?
In Los Angeles, many parents with significant professional obligations successfully maintain equal parenting time. High-level careers are common here, and judges understand that demanding work schedules are part of the local landscape. The question is not whether you work long hours; it is whether you remain consistently present, reliable, and engaged in your children’s lives.
Structure and reliability matter more than optics.
What If the Other Parent Does Not Work?
When one parent is home more during the day, it is common for that parent to argue that equal custody would be disruptive.
But California law does not presume that a stay-at-home parent is automatically the primary parent going forward.
Judges typically examine:
Whether both parents have maintained strong bonds
Whether the working parent’s schedule allows meaningful parenting time and meeting childcare obligations
Meeting the child’s academic, social, and enrichment needs
Whether a gradual transition (such as a step-up plan) makes sense
The guiding principle is preserving frequent and continuing contact with both parents when it is safe to do so, and when in the child’s best interest.
The Age of the Children Matters
The children’s ages significantly affect how courts view custody transitions.
Infants and Toddlers
With babies and very young children, custody analysis often looks different because developmental needs are different.
Infants and toddlers require near-constant supervision. Some may still be nursing, and many are not yet in full-day school or daycare. Their routines often revolve around naps, feeding schedules, and shorter preschool days. Exchanges tend to require more hands-on transitions, particularly when children are too young to move independently between households.
Co-parenting at this stage can be especially challenging in higher-conflict cases. Younger children require more coordination between parents, from feeding and sleep schedules to medical care and daily logistics. Unlike older children, they cannot simply manage curbside exchanges or communicate their own needs. As a result, parents must work together more closely to ensure consistency and stability.
In this age range, courts frequently prioritize frequent and consistent contact with both parents over long blocks of uninterrupted time. The goal is to support attachment, stability, and predictable routines while preserving each parent’s role in the child’s daily life.
In many professional households, structured childcare, including nannies or part-time preschool, is part of that framework. Courts understand this reality. The focus is not whether childcare is used, but whether each parent remains actively engaged in day-to-day parenting decisions and routines during their custodial time.
Preschool and Early Elementary Years
For children ages 3–8, courts often view equal timeshare as developmentally appropriate if both parents have been consistently involved. Equal schedules such as a 2-2-3 or 2-2-5 model are common for children this age when they serve the child’s best interest.
At this stage, daily structure becomes more predictable. Children are typically enrolled in preschool or elementary school, and their routines begin to center around fixed schedules. Judges therefore pay close attention to school logistics, extracurricular commitments, and each parent’s ability to manage transitions smoothly and reliably.
Courts may consider practical questions such as:
Who handles school drop-offs and pickups?
How far apart do the parents live from the school?
Can both households support homework routines and extracurricular participation?
Can both households support social development, like play dates and attendance at special events?
Is the proposed 50/50 schedule aligned with the child’s academic, medical, and social stability?
For working professionals and business owners, this stage often becomes less about the number of hours worked and more about coordination and infrastructure. Again, courts understand that many parents in Los Angeles maintain demanding careers. What matters is whether the parent has built a realistic plan, including appropriate childcare support when necessary, that allows them to remain actively involved in school routines, activities, and daily life.
The analysis remains child-centered. The court’s goal is not mathematical equality for its own sake, but a schedule that preserves meaningful relationships while maintaining educational and emotional stability.
Older Children
As children grow older, their schedules become more structured and increasingly self-directed. Academics, sports, extracurricular activities, and social commitments begin to shape the rhythm of their weeks. Older children are better able to express their preferences regarding friendships and activities, and they can manage school responsibilities with appropriate parental oversight. They also tend to move more independently between households and require less hands-on supervision.
Equal custody arrangements are common at this stage when both parents demonstrate reliability, cooperation, and the ability to support the child’s expanding academic and social commitments.
At this stage, courts often focus on continuity and logistical practicality. Questions may include:
Can both households support the child’s academic workload?
How will extracurricular schedules be managed across homes?
Does the proposed schedule minimize unnecessary disruption?
Are both parents able to maintain consistent expectations, routines, and age-appropriate supervision?
For older children, California courts may also consider the child’s preferences, depending on age and maturity. This does not mean a child “chooses” the schedule, but the court may give weight to a well-reasoned preference if the child is sufficiently mature.
As with younger children, the analysis remains centered on stability, meaningful contact with both parents, and the long term emotional and educational well-being of the child.
Does Using a Nanny or Childcare Affect 50/50 Custody?
In Los Angeles, many dual-income and single-income households use childcare. That alone does not undermine a parent’s custody position.
Courts generally look at:
Who hires, manages, and oversees the childcare
Whether caregivers are appropriately vetted and reliable
Whether childcare supports the parent’s involvement, rather than replacing it
The level of the parent’s day-to-day engagement during their custodial time
Whether the overall parenting schedule remains stable and consistent
Using appropriate childcare is not viewed negatively. What courts want to avoid is a situation where a parent effectively delegates their custodial time to a third party. Childcare should function as support infrastructure, not as a substitute for active parenting.
In high-functioning households, thoughtful childcare arrangements often allow professional responsibilities and consistent, engaged parenting to coexist.
Travel, Long Hours, and Executive Schedules
Travel and long workdays are common in many professions. Courts do not expect parents to abandon their careers.
Instead, judges look for:
A realistic proposed custody schedule
Clear contingency plans for travel
Make-up time when appropriate
Active participation in school and activities
Proactive communication
Level of cooperation between the parents
A parent who travels for work but remains consistently engaged in the child’s life is not disqualified from 50/50 custody.
Reliability and planning carry significant weight.
Step-Up Parenting Plans and Modifications
When a parent currently has less than 50% parenting time, a step-up plan may provide a structured path toward equal custody.
Step-up plans often involve:
Gradual increases in overnights
Defined timelines
Benchmarks tied to developmental milestones
Courts evaluate whether equal timeshare now serves the child’s best interest, not whether one parent prefers the status quo.
These cases are most effective when approached strategically, with clear proposals and supporting facts.
A Strategic Approach to 50/50 Custody
For professionals accustomed to control and precision in their careers, custody disputes can feel uniquely disorienting. The variables are emotional, the timeline is uncertain, and outcomes are shaped by both law and human dynamics.
The most effective approach is typically measured and structured rather than reactive.
This often includes:
Documenting historical involvement in the children’s daily routines
Documenting active involvement in medical care and academics, including attendance at medical appointments, parent-teacher conferences, and extracurricular activities
Proposing a realistic and developmentally appropriate parenting schedule
Accounting for school logistics, extracurricular commitments, and childcare infrastructure
Engaging in co-parenting counseling or structured conflict-resolution tools when helpful
Maintaining consistent, solution-oriented communication
In many cases, custody disputes resolve through negotiation. When both parents remain focused on the child’s stability, tools such as co-parenting counseling can create forward movement without court intervention.
However, if progress stalls or one parent resists reasonable expansion of parenting time without legitimate concerns, filing a Request for Order (RFO) may become appropriate. An RFO is a request for a court order. For example, an RFO can ask the court to review the existing arrangement and determine whether a modification to 50/50 custody better serves the child’s best interest.
The decision to file should not be impulsive. It should be strategic: supported by documentation, objective evidence, a clearly defined proposed schedule, and a child-centered rationale.
An experienced family law attorney can help identify and gather the information needed to support that request. This may include school records, medical records, and relevant communications (such as text messages or OurFamilyWizard messages), as well as developing a thoughtful record-building plan before filing.
Judges respond most favorably to parents who appear organized, prepared, and focused on solutions rather than conflict. A measured approach often carries more credibility than an aggressive one.
Frequently Asked Questions About 50/50 Custody and Working Parents in California
Does the court favor a stay-at-home parent in custody cases?
Not automatically. While courts consider each parent’s historical involvement, being a stay-at-home parent does not guarantee primary custody. Judges evaluate stability, engagement, and the child’s overall welfare, not employment status alone.
Can I modify custody to 50/50 in California?
Yes, parents can negotiate an agreement or a parent may file a Request for Order (RFO) seeking modification. The court will assess whether equal parenting time now serves the child’s best interest.
Does using a nanny hurt my custody case?
No. Many working parents in Los Angeles use childcare support. Courts do not automatically penalize responsible use of nannies or structured childcare. The focus is whether the parent remains actively involved in parenting decisions and daily life during their custodial time, and whether childcare is appropriately vetted and high quality.
What if my job requires travel?
Travel alone does not prevent 50/50 custody. Courts look for thoughtful planning, including realistic schedules, contingency arrangements, courteous logistical communication, and continued involvement. Reliability and structure matter more than occasional business travel.
Can a father get 50/50 custody in California?
Yes. California law does not favor mothers over fathers. Courts focus on the best interest of the child and aim to ensure frequent and continuing contact with both parents when appropriate. A father who demonstrates consistent involvement, stability, and a realistic parenting plan can obtain 50/50 custody.
Final Thoughts
If you are a working parent in Los Angeles wondering whether your demanding career will hurt your chances of obtaining 50/50 custody, California law does not presume that employment makes you less capable.
When a child’s best interest is at issue, courts look at parenting, not paychecks.
With thoughtful planning, structured proposals, and a child-centered strategy, equal custody is often achievable even when one parent works demanding hours and the other does not.
Every case turns on its specific facts. The age of the children, the existing parenting schedule, and each parent’s history of involvement all matter.
For professionals navigating custody in California, early and strategic preparation often determines whether the process becomes prolonged conflict, or results in a stable, workable long-term parenting structure.
--
Emily Rubenstein Law PC is a full service divorce and family law firm. We proudly serve Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, West Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Culver City, the South Bay, Glendale, Pasadena, Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Encino and all of Los Angeles County.
Give us a call or check out our website:
(310) 750-0827 | www.emilyrubensteinlaw.com